The Flood Insurance Gap

Bridging the Gap: The Case for Closing the Flood Insurance Deficit

Author

Gaston Brizuela Bosio
August 05, 2025 • Estimated Reading Time: 11 minutes

Introduction

As climate change accelerates the frequency and intensity of natural disasters, flood risk has emerged as a paramount challenge to global economic resilience. The increasing prevalence of devastating floods poses significant threats to public safety, infrastructure, and financial stability. Yet, the insurance industry continues to lag in bridging the enormous gap between economic losses and insured values.

The flood insurance gap — the difference between total economic losses caused by flooding and the amount covered by insurance — is now one of the most critical and strategic issues for insurers, reinsurers, institutional investors, and banking professionals facilitating transactions in the insurance space.

In this report, we synthesize market forecasts, economic loss data, and proprietary analyses from Aon, Gallagher Re, and other authoritative sources to unpack the structural and financial underpinnings of the global flood insurance gap. We also present compelling visualizations that underscore the magnitude and trajectory of the problem, while identifying key opportunities for underwriting growth, public-private partnerships, and capital investment in this underpenetrated segment.

The Expanding Flood Insurance Market

Flood risk is no longer an episodic concern; it is now a structural fixture of the global catastrophe landscape. According to market research data (see Chart 1 below), the global flood insurance market is expected to grow from $12.7 billion in 2024 to $45 billion in 2032, representing a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.1%. This rapid expansion reflects rising awareness, increasing flood events, and market penetration efforts — but it still falls well short of covering actual losses.

This projected market growth is promising. However, considering the billionaire gap that still exists, it’s clear the insurance market remains undersized relative to risk exposure. Even with robust growth, the insured market will only cover a fraction of anticipated annual flood damages in the near future.

Commercial vs. Residential Dynamics: Divergent Growth Paths

The next layer of insight lies in the bifurcation of the flood insurance market between commercial and residential segments. As seen in the chart below, commercial insurance currently dominates, but residential insurance is growing much faster, albeit from a lower base.

From 2024 to 2032, the residential segment is projected to increase by 424.3%, while commercial insurance grows by 187.3%. This shift indicates significant potential in personal lines, especially as homeowners face mounting flood risks outside FEMA's traditional high-hazard zones. This transition may also reflect regulatory pushes in countries like the U.S. and U.K., where floodplain mapping is being updated to reflect recent hydrologic realities.

Residential flood insurance, once a niche product, is becoming a mainstream necessity. For investors and insurers, this trend presents opportunities to design accessible and scalable flood protection offerings, perhaps via embedded insurance, public-private pools, or parametric solutions.

Correspondingly, residential flood insurance is taking an increasing share of the total market. The chart below illustrates a steady trend: residential’s market share rises from 28.2% in 2024 to 41.7% in 2032, while commercial declines from 71.8% to 58.3%.

This transformation suggests a slow but steady democratization of flood coverage. Historically, flood protection was concentrated among large property owners and municipalities. The coming decade will likely see increased participation by individual homeowners, driven by both necessity and regulatory evolution.

The implications for underwriting are profound. Residential policies typically involve higher volumes, lower premiums, and more complex pricing due to varying local risk factors. This dynamic may incentivize insurers to adopt AI-driven risk scoring, real-time geospatial analytics, and more aggressive risk-transfer mechanisms through reinsurance or ILS structures.

A Surge in Flood Losses: 2024 Sets a New Benchmark

The need for flood insurance is reinforced by rising economic damages. In 2024, global flood losses were measured around $84 billion — a 12% increase over the long-term average (2000–2023) and a massive +29% above the historical median.

This trajectory signals that flood risk is intensifying, both in frequency and cost. Urban expansion into flood-prone areas, aging infrastructure, and changing precipitation patterns are all contributing to more damaging flood events.

As noted in Aon’s 2025 Climate & Catastrophe Insight, 2024 marked one of the most destructive years on record for hydrological events. The urban flooding in Dubai, record-breaking rainfall in China, and severe inundations across the U.S. Midwest exemplify how global the flood peril has become. The insurance sector must adjust its models accordingly — pricing risks that are not just rising, but compounding.

Flooding: The Costliest and Most Frequent Hydrological Threat

Looking beyond individual years, flood ranks as the second-most expensive natural hazard globally over the last two decades, following only tropical cyclones. From 2000 to 2024, flooding caused $1.9 trillion in economic damages across 268 major loss events (+$1B losses events).

This frequency dimension is crucial. While cyclones and earthquakes are sporadic but extremely destructive, floods occur consistently and with increasing unpredictability. That consistency is what should concern underwriters and capital allocators most. Unlike a rare quake, floods return annually, creating compounding exposures for insurers and governments alike.

For investment professionals, this positions flood insurance as a long-term, high-urgency growth category. Unlike one-off CAT events, floods create persistent market opportunities, particularly in jurisdictions where private insurance has traditionally taken a backseat to government relief.

The Insurance Gap: A Staggering Deficit

The most alarming data point of all comes from the comparison between insured and uninsured flood losses. In 2024, only $21 billion of the $84 billion in flood-related economic damages are expected to be insured — just 25%. This leaves a $63 billion shortfall to be borne by governments, businesses, and individuals.

Over the 2000–2024 period, the disparity is even starker. Total insured losses during this period amount to $319 billion, while uninsured losses top $1.58 trillion. This $1.26 trillion gap is not just a missed revenue opportunity — it represents unmitigated financial distress for vulnerable communities and undercapitalized municipalities.

For the insurance industry, this underinsurance represents both a business challenge and a public imperative. Addressing this gap requires innovation, education, regulatory clarity, and capital. It also demands coordination with public-sector agencies to expand the insurance pool, reduce moral hazard, and incentivize risk-reducing behavior.

Drivers of the Insurance Gap: A Multivariate Problem

The causes of this protection gap are complex. According to Aon’s and Gallagher Re’s 2025 reports, four key drivers have emerged:

  1. Risk Awareness and Perception – Many property owners still don’t understand their flood exposure, especially in regions where historical data underrepresents emerging threats due to outdated floodplain maps or non-traditional weather patterns.

  2. Affordability and Accessibility – Flood insurance is often expensive, particularly in high-risk areas. For lower-income households, it may be viewed as discretionary, particularly when government relief is seen as a backstop.

  3. Regulatory Fragmentation – The availability of flood insurance varies dramatically by country and even state. In the U.S., for instance, the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) still dominates, but its pricing reforms and flood zone delineations lag behind private-sector innovation.

  4. Climate Volatility – Traditional actuarial models are struggling to account for compounding risks, such as riverine flooding combined with flash floods, or back-to-back seasonal events.

Each of these drivers contributes to structural underinsurance, which cannot be resolved by pricing alone. It requires ecosystem thinking: brokers, governments, reinsurers, and capital providers working in alignment.

The Case for Urgency: Strategic and Capital Market Implications

For insurance executives and institutional investors, the flood protection gap is more than a humanitarian issue — it’s a massive untapped growth engine. According to Aon's 2025 report, approximately $63 billion of losses in 2024 alone went uninsured. Even partial penetration of this uninsured segment — say, capturing 25% — would yield more than $15 billion in new premium opportunity in a single year.

Moreover, the shift toward parametric insurance, public-private reinsurance structures, and catastrophe bonds tied to hydrological indices could help bring capacity to hard-to-insure areas. For capital markets, ILS vehicles offer ways to gain exposure to flood risk with clearly modeled outcomes, sidestepping legacy pricing uncertainties.

On the M&A front, we expect growing investor interest in MGAs, flood tech platforms, and data-rich underwriting startups focused on property risk. With accurate risk scoring and tech-enabled distribution, these entities are poised to reshape the flood insurance ecosystem — from underwriting to claims settlement.

Conclusion: Bridging the Chasm

The flood insurance gap is one of the most urgent and solvable crises facing the global risk management community. Flooding is increasing in frequency, scale, and unpredictability. Yet insurance coverage remains woefully inadequate.

With a $1.26 trillion cumulative protection gap and flood events occurring more often than any other peril, the insurance industry must move quickly. The data paints a clear picture — the market is growing, but not fast enough. Residential coverage is rising, but awareness and affordability remain major hurdles.

For executives, now is the time to invest in scalable flood solutions. For investors, it’s a unique convergence of climate urgency, capital demand, and technological innovation. For governments and regulators, it’s a wake-up call to enable the private market to do what it does best: price and transfer risk.

The opportunity is massive. So is the responsibility.

Sources & References

AP. (2025). US economic losses from natural disasters soared in 2024, even as they eased globally. https://apnews.com/article/hurricanes-wildfires-floods-damage-economic-loss-a3a6a5ec11d25edf4e845889eac9cd83 

World Economic Forum. (2025). The Global Risks Report 2025. MarshMcLennan: https://www.marshmclennan.com/insights/publications/2025/january/global-risks-report.html 

Premium Perks

Since you are an Executive Subscriber, you get access to all the full length reports our research team makes every week. Interested in learning all the hard data behind the article? If so, this report is just for you.

The Flood Insurance Gap.pdf252.24 KB • PDF File

Want to check the other reports? Access the Report Repository here.